Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-15

STATE OF HARYANA vs M/S. CRYSTIC RESIN (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/3575
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
M/S. CRYSTIC RESIN (INDIA) PVT. LTD.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the exercise of revisional power under Section 40 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, after its repeal by the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003, is unsustainable. The Court held that the repeal and saving clause in Section 61 of the Act of 2003 only preserved pending proceedings, and since no proceedings were pending against the respondent under the repealed Act, the revisional power could not be invoked. The Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the order for recovery was invalid due to the lack of jurisdiction post-repeal.

STATE OF HARYANA vs M/S. CRYSTIC RESIN (INDIA) PVT. LTD. · Niyam