Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-15

STATE OF HARYANA vs M/S RAWAL CARPETS, PANIPAT

Citation / case number
SC 2006/3573
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
M/S RAWAL CARPETS, PANIPAT
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the exercise of revisional power under Section 40 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, after its repeal by the Haryana Value Added Tax, 2003, is unsustainable. The Court held that the repeal and saving clause in Section 61 of the Act of 2003 only preserved pending proceedings, and since there were no such proceedings against the respondent, the revisional powers could not be invoked. The decision of the High Court was upheld, confirming that the order for recovery was invalid under the repealed Act.

STATE OF HARYANA vs M/S RAWAL CARPETS, PANIPAT · Niyam