Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-15

THE STATE OF HARYANA vs M/S. CRYSTIC RESINS INDIA (P) LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2006/11808
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent
M/S. CRYSTIC RESINS INDIA (P) LTD.
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the exercise of revisional power under Section 40 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, after its repeal by the Haryana Value Added Tax, 2003, is unsustainable. The Court held that the repeal and saving clause in Section 61 of the Act of 2003 only preserved pending proceedings, and since no such proceedings existed against the respondent at the time of repeal, the revisional powers could not be invoked. The judgment affirmed the High Court's decision, thereby denying the State's claim for recovery of the refund amount.

THE STATE OF HARYANA vs M/S. CRYSTIC RESINS INDIA (P) LTD. · Niyam