Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-15

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL vs M/S. KUMAON STONE CRUSHER

Citation / case number
SC 2004/19096
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL
Respondent
M/S. KUMAON STONE CRUSHER
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed multiple appeals concerning the interpretation of various provisions under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly focusing on Section 34 regarding the setting aside of arbitral awards. The Court established that the grounds for setting aside an award must be strictly adhered to, emphasizing that mere dissatisfaction with the award does not suffice. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the validity of the arbitral awards in question.

STATE OF UTTARANCHAL vs M/S. KUMAON STONE CRUSHER · Niyam