Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-09-22

The State Of Jharkhand vs M/S Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 282
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
The State Of Jharkhand
Respondent
M/S Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.
Author
S.Abdul Nazeer
Bench
Chief Justice, A.K. Sikri, A.M. Khanwilkar, D.Y. Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan, S.Abdul Nazeer

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, specifically Section 34, the jurisdiction to entertain objections to an arbitral award lies with the court that directed the filing of the award. The Court emphasized that the right to appeal is a valuable right and should not be deprived without cogent reasons. The judgment clarified that the Supreme Court does not qualify as a court under Section 2(1)(e) of the Act, thereby establishing that jurisdiction cannot be assumed by consent of the parties.

The State Of Jharkhand vs M/S Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. · Niyam