Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-10-12

NATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS JOINT SECRETARY vs THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA CHAIRMAN

Citation / case number
SC 2017/3490
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS JOINT SECRETARY
Respondent
THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA CHAIRMAN
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of the designation system for Senior Advocates, finding that the current voting method violates Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution, as it is arbitrary and lacks diversity. The Court held that a permanent Selection Committee should be established to ensure a fair assessment process for designating Senior Advocates, thereby mandating a reconsideration of previous decisions regarding designations. The outcome emphasizes the need for structured guidelines and a transparent process in the designation of Senior Advocates.

NATIONAL LAWYERS CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL TRANSPARENCY AND REFORMS JOINT SECRETARY vs THE BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA CHAIRMAN · Niyam