Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-10-12

THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA BAR ASSOCIATION vs THE REGISTRAR GENERAL

Citation / case number
SC 2016/26464
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA BAR ASSOCIATION
Respondent
THE REGISTRAR GENERAL
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of the designation system for Senior Advocates, finding it arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 15, and 21 of the Constitution. The Court held that a permanent Selection Committee should be established to ensure a fair and transparent process for designating Senior Advocates, thereby mandating the reconsideration of previous decisions regarding designations. The outcome emphasized the need for guidelines and a point-based assessment system for designations, reinforcing the principles of diversity and meritocracy in legal practice.

THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA BAR ASSOCIATION vs THE REGISTRAR GENERAL · Niyam