Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-10-13

Federation Of Indian Mineral ... vs Union Of India

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 140
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Federation Of Indian Mineral ...
Respondent
Union Of India
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
Deepak Gupta, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Madan B. Lokur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the amendments made to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, particularly focusing on Section 9B, which mandates the establishment of the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) for the benefit of areas affected by mining operations. The Court held that the holder of a mining lease must contribute to the DMF in addition to paying royalty, with the contribution not exceeding one-third of the royalty amount. The judgment affirmed the legality of the amendments and the obligations imposed on mining leaseholders under the MMDR Act.

Federation Of Indian Mineral ... vs Union Of India · Niyam