Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

october 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-10-05

M/S Meters And Instruments Private ... vs Kanchan Mehta

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 4594
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S Meters And Instruments Private ...
Respondent
Kanchan Mehta
Author
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of compounding offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, holding that consent from the complainant is necessary for compounding, as established in JIK Industries Ltd. v. Amarlal Jumani (2012) 3 SCC 255. The Court emphasized that the legislative intent behind Section 138 is to enhance the acceptability of cheques and facilitate business transactions. The appeals were dismissed as the High Court's refusal to allow compounding was upheld, reinforcing the requirement of complainant consent for such proceedings.

M/S Meters And Instruments Private ... vs Kanchan Mehta · Niyam