Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-11-28

RAHUL ARORA vs THE STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
SC 2017/32195
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAHUL ARORA
Respondent
THE STATE OF HARYANA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, due to the petitioners' failure to comply with court orders and their lack of bona fides. The Court noted that the petitioners had repeatedly changed their stance regarding the transfer of property as per a Memorandum of Understanding. However, upon subsequent compliance with the property transfer, the Court permitted the appellants to approach the High Court for appropriate proceedings, indicating that the dismissal did not affect the merits of the case.

RAHUL ARORA vs THE STATE OF HARYANA · Niyam