Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-11-29

VINOD GOYAL . vs VISHRANTI CITY RESIDENTS WELFARE SOCIETY .

Citation / case number
SC 2016/32234
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
VINOD GOYAL .
Respondent
VISHRANTI CITY RESIDENTS WELFARE SOCIETY .
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's directions regarding the auction of personal properties of the partners of M/s Sai Apartments and Infrastructure Ltd. due to their failure to provide basic amenities as per the allotment agreement. The Court emphasized that the developer's non-compliance with conditions for obtaining NOC from Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (PSPCL) warranted such measures. The judgment reinforced the principle that consumer complaints under the Indian Penal Code must be treated seriously, establishing a framework for accountability of developers in real estate projects.

VINOD GOYAL . vs VISHRANTI CITY RESIDENTS WELFARE SOCIETY . · Niyam