Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-11-13

POPCORN PROPERTIES PVT. LTD . THROUGH DIRECTOR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/25003
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
POPCORN PROPERTIES PVT. LTD . THROUGH DIRECTOR
Respondent
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA .
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the provisional acceptance of the Appellant's bid by MHADA was valid and should have been upheld, as the Respondent's bid was not properly considered due to lack of notice to the Appellant. The Court emphasized that the Appellant, being the highest bidder, had a right in equity to the settlement, and the cancellation of its bid was inequitable and politically influenced. The Court held that the order for fresh tenders was erroneous and restored the Appellant's provisional acceptance, allowing it to proceed with the settlement.

POPCORN PROPERTIES PVT. LTD . THROUGH DIRECTOR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . · Niyam