Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

november 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-11-29

Vinod Goyal . vs Vishranti City Residents Welfare ...

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 497
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Vinod Goyal .
Respondent
Vishranti City Residents Welfare ...
Author
R. Banumathi
Bench
R. Banumathi, Kurian Joseph

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's directions regarding the auction of personal properties of partners of M/S Sai Apartments and Infrastructure Ltd. due to non-compliance with infrastructure development obligations under the allotment agreement. The Court emphasized that the High Court's orders, including the attachment of properties and the requirement for consumer complaints to be treated as separate offences under applicable laws, were justified to protect consumer interests. The appeal by the partners was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to ensure accountability in the real estate sector.

Vinod Goyal . vs Vishranti City Residents Welfare ... · Niyam