Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-05-12

UMA SHANKAR vs R. HANUMAIAH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH ITS LRS. .

Citation / case number
SC 2015/8900
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UMA SHANKAR
Respondent
R. HANUMAIAH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH ITS LRS. .
Author
NAVIN SINHA ARUN MISHRA
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of re-conveyance of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, specifically citing Section 48 regarding vesting of land. The Court established that once land vests with the State, the power of re-conveyance cannot be exercised, as affirmed in Bangalore Development Authority vs. R. Hanumaiah (2005) 12 SCC 508. The Court held that the High Court's decision allowing re-conveyance was erroneous and set it aside, reinforcing the principle that the acquisition process is complete upon vesting.

UMA SHANKAR vs R. HANUMAIAH SINCE DECEASED THROUGH ITS LRS. . · Niyam