Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-05-26

SATISH & ANR. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA

Citation / case number
SC 2013/12842
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
SATISH & ANR. ETC.
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the convictions under Section 120-B, 302, and 34 IPC, affirming life imprisonment for the appellants. The Court found that the delay in lodging the FIR did not undermine the prosecution's case, as the evidence presented, including the extra-judicial confession, was sufficient to establish guilt. The Court emphasized that the extra-judicial confession was corroborated by other evidence, and the acquittal of a co-accused did not negate the culpability of the appellants.

SATISH & ANR. ETC. vs STATE OF HARYANA · Niyam