Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-05-02

CHILAMKURTI BALA SUBRAHMANYAM vs SAMANTHAPUDI VIJAYA LAKSHIMI

Citation / case number
SC 2006/8039
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CHILAMKURTI BALA SUBRAHMANYAM
Respondent
SAMANTHAPUDI VIJAYA LAKSHIMI
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE R.K. AGRAWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that the provisions of Order 21 Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, allow a judgment debtor to challenge an auction sale on the grounds of material irregularity or fraud. The Court emphasized that the burden of proof lies on the judgment debtor to establish such irregularities. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's order and restoring the trial court's dismissal of the judgment debtor's application, thereby upholding the auction sale.

CHILAMKURTI BALA SUBRAHMANYAM vs SAMANTHAPUDI VIJAYA LAKSHIMI · Niyam