Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

may 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-05-02

State Of U.P vs Sunil

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 2150
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P
Respondent
Sunil
Author
Pinaki Chandra Ghose
Bench
Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Rohinton Fali Nariman

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the High Court's judgment that acquitted the accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The Court noted that the High Court's reliance on circumstantial evidence was flawed, as key witness testimonies were deemed unreliable and the evidence of recovery was insufficient to establish guilt. The Supreme Court ultimately set aside the High Court's acquittal, reinstating the conviction and death sentence imposed by the Trial Court.

State Of U.P vs Sunil · Niyam