Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-21

RAM KISHAN FAUJI vs STATE OF HARYANA .

Citation / case number
SC 2016/18320
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
RAM KISHAN FAUJI
Respondent
STATE OF HARYANA .
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the recommendation of the Lokayukta for the registration of an FIR under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, based on allegations of bribery and corruption. The Court emphasized the necessity of a preliminary inquiry as mandated by the judgment in Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of Uttar Pradesh, ensuring that the authenticity of evidence, such as the Compact Disc, is verified before proceeding with the investigation. The Court dismissed the appellant's writ petition challenging the Lokayukta's orders, affirming that the actions taken were within the legal framework of the Haryana Lokayukta Act, 2002, and the 1988 Act.

RAM KISHAN FAUJI vs STATE OF HARYANA . · Niyam