Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-08

AMIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs BHUSHAN LAL

Citation / case number
SC 2015/8505
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
AMIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER
Respondent
BHUSHAN LAL
Author
R. BANUMATHI
Bench
MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR R. BANUMATHI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the eviction of the respondent-tenant from the residential property under the Rent Control Act. The Court noted that the tenant had agreed to vacate the house by 30.09.2012, while allowing him to retain the shop on the condition of paying enhanced rent of Rs. 10,000 per month. The Court confirmed that the tenant had complied with the order by vacating the house, and directed the tenant to deposit Rs. 8.70 lakhs for unpaid rent, establishing the principle that landlords are entitled to timely rent payments.

AMIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs BHUSHAN LAL · Niyam