Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-10

IMAX CORPORATION vs M/S E-CITY ENTERTAINMENT (I) P.LTD.

Citation / case number
SC 2013/34402
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
IMAX CORPORATION
Respondent
M/S E-CITY ENTERTAINMENT (I) P.LTD.
Author
S. A. BOBDE
Bench
ASHOK BHUSHAN S.A. BOBDE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is maintainable even when the arbitration clause specifies a foreign jurisdiction, as long as the arbitration is conducted in India. The Court held that the High Court's decision to allow the petition was valid, emphasizing that the arbitration clause did not exclude the applicability of Part-I of the Arbitration Act. The appeal by Imax Corporation was dismissed, affirming the maintainability of the arbitration petition.

IMAX CORPORATION vs M/S E-CITY ENTERTAINMENT (I) P.LTD. · Niyam