Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-07

PRATIBHA PRATISTHAN vs MANAGER, CANARA BANK .

Citation / case number
SC 2007/35205
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
PRATIBHA PRATISTHAN
Respondent
MANAGER, CANARA BANK .
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
PRAFULLA C. PANT MADAN B. LOKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that a Trust cannot file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as it does not fall within the definition of 'complainant' under Section 2(b) of the Act. The Court clarified that the definitions of 'complainant' and 'consumer' in Sections 2(b) and 2(d) respectively do not include a Trust, thereby affirming the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's decision. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, reinforcing the interpretation of the Act's provisions regarding who can initiate consumer complaints.

PRATIBHA PRATISTHAN vs MANAGER, CANARA BANK . · Niyam