Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-28

M/S. BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD. vs C.I.T., DELHI-V

Citation / case number
SC 2006/20829
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
M/S. BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD.
Respondent
C.I.T., DELHI-V
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE R.K. AGRAWAL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the interpretation of 'capital employed in the business of the company' under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act, holding that share premium received on issued shares qualifies as part of the capital employed. The Court upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax, which allowed the appellant's claim for deduction of preliminary expenses based on this interpretation. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed, affirming the lower court's ruling in favor of the appellant.

M/S. BERGER PAINTS INDIA LTD. vs C.I.T., DELHI-V · Niyam