SATISH CHANDER AGGARWAL (D) BY LRS. vs SHYAM LAL OM PRAKASH, ARHTI

The Supreme Court held that the bona fide requirement established by the original landlord under Section 21(a) of the U.P. Urban Building Act can be relied upon by the surviving legal heirs to seek eviction. The Court found that since the family business is continued by the heirs, it suffices to meet the bona fide need without requiring a separate cause of action. Consequently, the Court set aside the High Court's order and restored the eviction order passed by the First Appellate Authority.