Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-29

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs M. SETHUMADHAVAN .

Citation / case number
SC 2005/27626
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA
Respondent
M. SETHUMADHAVAN .
Author
R. BANUMATHI KURIAN JOSEPH
Bench
R. BANUMATHI KURIAN JOSEPH

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of the cut-off date for gratuity payment as per Proviso 2 to Regulation 46(2) of the Nationalised Banks' Regulations. The Court upheld the fixation of the cut-off date for gratuity calculation, stating it does not violate Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, and referenced the Full Bench decision of the Kerala High Court. The Court concluded that the appellants are justified in their approach and are not bound to pay arrears for those who retired before the specified date, affirming the legality of the regulations in question.

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA vs M. SETHUMADHAVAN . · Niyam