Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-21

Palanisamy And Ors vs K. Dhanpalan

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 558
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Palanisamy And Ors
Respondent
K. Dhanpalan
Author
A.M.Khanwilkar
Bench
Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, A.M. Khanwilkar, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the findings of the Bar Council of India regarding the professional misconduct of the appellants, emphasizing the importance of maintaining proper accounts and adhering to client instructions as per the legal profession's ethical standards. The Court noted that the Disciplinary Committee's decision was based on a thorough inquiry, despite the appellants' claims of procedural unfairness, including lack of cross-examination and reliance on untranslated documents. The Court affirmed the reprimand and financial penalties imposed on the appellants, reinforcing the need for accountability in legal practice under the Advocates Act, 1961.

Palanisamy And Ors vs K. Dhanpalan · Niyam