Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-01

Dnyandeo Sabaji Naik And Anr vs Pradnya Prakash Khadekar And Ors

Citation / case number
AIRONLINE 2017 SC 515
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Dnyandeo Sabaji Naik And Anr
Respondent
Pradnya Prakash Khadekar And Ors
Author
D Y Chandrachud
Bench
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, D Y Chandrachud, Jagdish Singh Khehar

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the Special Leave Petitions arising from the Bombay High Court's orders regarding eviction from commercial premises under a conducting agreement. The Court held that the petitioners were in occupation based on a conducting agreement, thus establishing that the relationship was not that of licensor and licensee, which precluded the jurisdiction of the Small Causes Court under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Causes Courts’ Act. The Court condoned the delay in filing the petitions and upheld the findings of the lower courts regarding the nature of the tenancy and the eviction decree.

Dnyandeo Sabaji Naik And Anr vs Pradnya Prakash Khadekar And Ors · Niyam