Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-28

Karunakaran vs V. Padmini & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 2056
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Karunakaran
Respondent
V. Padmini & Ors
Author
Deepak Gupta
Bench
Deepak Gupta, Madan B. Lokur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the application of Section 96 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963, affirming that land assignment must prioritize landless agricultural laborers, including kudikidappukars. The Court clarified that the assignment of land to Respondent No.1 was valid as she met the criteria of being a landless agricultural laborer, despite the landlord's objections regarding the land being covered by a building. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the lower court's decision to uphold the assignment of land to Respondent No.1.

Karunakaran vs V. Padmini & Ors · Niyam