Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-21

Neeraj Kumar Sainy And Ors vs State Of U.P And Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 1524
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Neeraj Kumar Sainy And Ors
Respondent
State Of U.P And Ors
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
Amitava Roy, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the authorities are mandated to conduct the second, third, and mop-up rounds of counselling for UPPGMEE 2016 as per the Information Brochure, emphasizing the obligation to fill vacant seats to uphold the rights of candidates. The Court clarified that the failure to conduct these rounds infringes on the candidates' rights to admission based on merit, and directed the respondents to comply with the prescribed counselling process. The judgment also referenced previous rulings, including the case of Mridul Dhar, but underscored that adherence to the Information Brochure takes precedence in this context.

Neeraj Kumar Sainy And Ors vs State Of U.P And Ors · Niyam