Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-28

Virupakshappa Gouda And Another vs The State Of Karnataka And Another

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SC 1685
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Virupakshappa Gouda And Another
Respondent
The State Of Karnataka And Another
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
A.M. Khanwilkar, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the repeated bail applications of the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 302, 504, 114 read with Section 149 IPC. The Court emphasized that while successive bail applications are permissible, the burden lies on the accused to demonstrate a change in circumstances justifying bail. The Court upheld the lower courts' decisions to deny bail, citing the serious nature of the charges and the evidence presented, thereby affirming the rejection of bail applications.

Virupakshappa Gouda And Another vs The State Of Karnataka And Another · Niyam