Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-03-10

Imax Corporation vs M/S E-City Entertainment (I) P.Ltd

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SC 1372
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Imax Corporation
Respondent
M/S E-City Entertainment (I) P.Ltd
Author
S. A. Bobde
Bench
S.A. Bobde, Ashok Bhushan

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the maintainability of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in light of an arbitration clause specifying Singapore law and jurisdiction. The Court held that the High Court's order allowing the petition was maintainable despite the appellant's objections regarding the applicability of Part-I of the Arbitration Act. The ruling clarified that the jurisdictional seat of arbitration being in London does not preclude the Indian courts from entertaining the petition under Section 34.

Imax Corporation vs M/S E-City Entertainment (I) P.Ltd · Niyam