Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-06-19

MUL CHAND SHARMA vs DAINIK BHASKER CORPN LTD AND ORS CHAIRMAN

Citation / case number
SC 2017/9031
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MUL CHAND SHARMA
Respondent
DAINIK BHASKER CORPN LTD AND ORS CHAIRMAN
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed multiple contempt petitions arising from WP (C) No. 246 of 2011, emphasizing the need for compliance with its earlier orders. The Court reiterated that non-compliance with its directives constitutes contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, and outlined the consequences for such actions. The Court held that the respondents must adhere to the orders issued, failing which appropriate punitive measures would be taken against them.

MUL CHAND SHARMA vs DAINIK BHASKER CORPN LTD AND ORS CHAIRMAN · Niyam