RAMA SHUKLA vs SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION

The Supreme Court addressed multiple contempt petitions arising from WP (C) No. 246 of 2011, emphasizing the importance of compliance with its earlier orders. The Court reiterated that failure to comply with its directives constitutes contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, specifically under Section 2(b). The Court held that the respondents must be held accountable for their non-compliance, leading to the issuance of appropriate sanctions against them.