Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

june 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-06-09

BINOY VISMAN vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2017/11151
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
BINOY VISMAN
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 139AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which mandates quoting of Aadhaar numbers for obtaining Permanent Account Numbers (PAN) and filing income tax returns. The Court held that the provision infringes the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution, as it effectively makes Aadhaar enrollment compulsory for tax assessees. Consequently, the Court struck down the provision as unconstitutional, emphasizing the need for a balance between state interests and individual rights.

BINOY VISMAN vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam