SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA vs RAMESH CHANDRA AGARWAL .

The Supreme Court addressed multiple contempt petitions arising from WP (C) No. 246 of 2011, emphasizing the need for compliance with its earlier orders. The Court reiterated that failure to comply with its directives constitutes contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Court held that the respondents must adhere to the timelines set forth in previous judgments, ensuring accountability and enforcement of its orders.