Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-07-04

ROGER SHASHOUA vs MUKESH SHARMA

Citation / case number
SC 2016/23718
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ROGER SHASHOUA
Respondent
MUKESH SHARMA
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of territorial jurisdiction concerning petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that both the writ petition and the Section 34 petition should be heard together in the High Court of Delhi, as the matters were interconnected. The Court transferred the writ petition from the High Court of Allahabad to the High Court of Delhi for consolidated adjudication, emphasizing the need for a unified approach in resolving the disputes arising from the arbitration proceedings.

ROGER SHASHOUA vs MUKESH SHARMA · Niyam