Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-07-05

NAVNIRAMAN DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS (I) PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR vs DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND PRESIDENT DISTRICT SPORTS COMPLEX EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Citation / case number
SC 2014/34348
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
NAVNIRAMAN DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS (I) PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR
Respondent
DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND PRESIDENT DISTRICT SPORTS COMPLEX EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Author
Abhay Manohar Sapre
Bench
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the High Court is empowered to appoint an Arbitral Tribunal when a party fails to do so. The Court found that the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's appeal against the modified award was erroneous and remanded the case for a fresh decision on merits. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the arbitration agreement and the need for proper adjudication of disputes arising from it.

NAVNIRAMAN DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS (I) PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR vs DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AND PRESIDENT DISTRICT SPORTS COMPLEX EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE · Niyam