Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-07-21

Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula ... vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi)

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula ...
Respondent
State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi)
Author
Dipak Misra
Bench
R.F. Nariman, Dipak Misra

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 2(d) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, holding that the definition of 'child' encompasses not only biological age but also mental age, thereby including individuals above 18 years who are mentally challenged. The Court emphasized the necessity for trials involving such individuals to be conducted in a congenial atmosphere, as mandated by the POCSO Act. The judgment affirmed the High Court's direction for the transfer of the case to a Special Court under the POCSO Act for appropriate proceedings.

Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula ... vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi) · Niyam