Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

july 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-07-25

State Of U.P vs Anand Kumar Yadav .

Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
State Of U.P
Respondent
Anand Kumar Yadav .
Author
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the validity of certain government orders concerning the appointment of teachers in Uttar Pradesh, emphasizing compliance with the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Act, 1972. The Court held that the appointments made without adhering to the statutory requirements were invalid, thereby reinforcing the necessity of following due process in public employment. The judgment reiterated the importance of transparency and meritocracy in recruitment processes under Article 14 of the Constitution of India, leading to the dismissal of the appeals filed by the State.

State Of U.P vs Anand Kumar Yadav . · Niyam