Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-01-04

GOPAL AND SONS (HUF) vs CIT KOLKATA-XI

Citation / case number
SC 2015/18134
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
GOPAL AND SONS (HUF)
Respondent
CIT KOLKATA-XI
Author
A.K. SIKRI
Bench
ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) can be considered a registered and beneficial shareholder under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that an HUF cannot be a registered shareholder in a company, and therefore, any advances received by the HUF cannot be deemed as dividend under the Act. The addition of Rs. 1,20,10,988 as deemed dividend was set aside, affirming the position that the shares were issued in the name of the Karta and not the HUF itself.

GOPAL AND SONS (HUF) vs CIT KOLKATA-XI · Niyam