Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-01-25

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE vs ANASUYA BAI (D) BY LRS. .

Citation / case number
SC 2015/10982
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE
Respondent
ANASUYA BAI (D) BY LRS. .
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the applicability of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, in cases where land is acquired under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. The Court held that the provisions of the New LA Act do not apply to acquisitions made under the KIAD Act, as the latter has its own compensation framework outlined in Section 29. The ruling clarifies the legal boundaries between the two statutes regarding land acquisition processes.

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE vs ANASUYA BAI (D) BY LRS. . · Niyam