Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-02-15

MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Citation / case number
SC 2016/33935
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA
Respondent
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Author
AMITAVA ROY ARUN MISHRA
Bench
AMITAVA ROY ARUN MISHRA

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the bail application of the appellant involved in the Saradha Chit Fund Scam, emphasizing the gravity of the allegations under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, The Companies Act, 1956, and The Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court noted the extensive financial fraud affecting numerous depositors, particularly from vulnerable sections of society, and highlighted the need for a thorough investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) due to the inter-state ramifications of the scam. The Court ultimately upheld the rejection of bail, recognizing the serious nature of the charges and the ongoing investigation.

MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION · Niyam