Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-02-09

ASSOCIATION OF VICTIMS OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY vs SUSHIL ANSAL AND ANR.

Citation / case number
SC 2015/43172
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
ASSOCIATION OF VICTIMS OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY
Respondent
SUSHIL ANSAL AND ANR.
Author
RANJAN GOGOI,KURIAN JOSEPH,ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
Bench
RANJAN GOGOI,KURIAN JOSEPH,ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reviewed the sentences awarded to Sushil Ansal and Gopal Ansal under Section 304A IPC, emphasizing that substitution of sentence by fine is not permissible. The Court reiterated that the accused deserved the maximum sentence for their negligence leading to the Uphaar tragedy. The review petition was considered in light of the gravity of the offenses and the need for deterrence, ultimately upholding the trial court's conviction and sentence.

ASSOCIATION OF VICTIMS OF UPHAAR TRAGEDY vs SUSHIL ANSAL AND ANR. · Niyam