Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-02-02

P. SIVANANDI vs RAJEEV KUMAR .

Citation / case number
SC 2006/28085
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P. SIVANANDI
Respondent
RAJEEV KUMAR .
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
PRAFULLA C. PANT MADAN B. LOKUR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of an officer is an integral part of his service record and cannot be disregarded for promotion solely due to delays in its preparation. The Court held that the Madras High Court's decision, which suggested otherwise, was incorrect. The Court emphasized that an officer should not be prejudiced by the delay in writing the ACR, affirming the importance of complete and accurate service records in promotion decisions under the Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955.

P. SIVANANDI vs RAJEEV KUMAR . · Niyam