Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-02-02

P. Sivanandi vs Rajeev Kumar & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 714
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
P. Sivanandi
Respondent
Rajeev Kumar & Ors
Author
Madan B. Lokur
Bench
Prafulla C. Pant, Madan B. Lokur

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court ruled that the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of an officer is an integral part of his service record and cannot be disregarded for promotion due to delays in its preparation. The Court held that Sivanandi's ACRs, including those written after delays, were valid and should be considered for his promotion to the Indian Police Service (IPS). The judgment of the Madras High Court was set aside, affirming Sivanandi's promotion with the year of allotment being 1991.

P. Sivanandi vs Rajeev Kumar & Ors · Niyam