Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-02-21

Satish Kumar Gupta And Etc. Etc vs State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 1072
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Satish Kumar Gupta And Etc. Etc
Respondent
State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc
Author
Adarsh Kumar Goel
Bench
Uday Umesh Lalit, Adarsh Kumar Goel

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed whether a post-acquisition allottee of land has locus standi in compensation determination under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. It held that such an allottee is a necessary party due to their financial liability for enhanced compensation as per the Conveyance Deed. The Court remanded the matter for fresh disposal, allowing the allottee to be impleaded and additional evidence to be presented, emphasizing the need for proper representation in compensation proceedings under Section 50 of the Act.

Satish Kumar Gupta And Etc. Etc vs State Of Haryana And Ors. Etc · Niyam