Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-02-10

Executive Officer, Arulmigu ... vs Chandran & Ors

Citation / case number
AIR 2017 SUPREME COURT 1034
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
Executive Officer, Arulmigu ...
Respondent
Chandran & Ors
Author
Ashok Bhushan
Bench
Ashok Bhushan, Ranjan Gogoi

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court upheld the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court's decision to reverse the trial court's judgment, granting the plaintiff a declaration of ownership and a mandatory injunction to correct revenue records under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Court established that the plaintiff had valid title through a chain of transfers leading to the Sale Deed dated 04.11.2007, despite the defendant's claims of ownership based on revenue records. The Court emphasized the importance of documentary evidence in establishing ownership and clarified that the suit was maintainable despite the defendant's objections regarding necessary parties.

Executive Officer, Arulmigu ... vs Chandran & Ors · Niyam