Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-01

CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORMS vs UNION OF INDIA

Citation / case number
SC 2017/34846
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORMS
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court reaffirmed the principle that the Chief Justice of India holds the same administrative powers as the Chief Justice of a High Court, as established in State of Rajasthan vs. Prakash Chand (1998) 1 SCC 1. The Court emphasized that the Chief Justice is the master of the roster, with exclusive authority to constitute benches and allocate cases, and that no judge can act contrary to the Chief Justice's directions. This judgment reinforces judicial discipline and the hierarchical structure within the judiciary, ensuring that administrative control remains centralized under the Chief Justice.

CAMPAIGN FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY AND REFORMS vs UNION OF INDIA · Niyam