Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-15

UNION OF INDIA vs PFIZER LIMITED

Citation / case number
SC 2017/3271
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA
Respondent
PFIZER LIMITED
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court interpreted Section 26A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, affirming that prior consultation with the Drugs Technical Advisory Board (DTAB) is a mandatory condition before the Central Government exercises its power under this section. The Court distinguished this position from earlier judgments of the Karnataka and Madras High Courts, which held that such consultation was not necessary. The ruling emphasizes the importance of regulatory oversight in ensuring the safety and efficacy of Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs) in the Indian market.

UNION OF INDIA vs PFIZER LIMITED · Niyam