Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-15

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. vs B.R.SAINI

Citation / case number
SC 2012/25577
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.
Respondent
B.R.SAINI
Author
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court addressed the legality of the removal of the Respondent from service under the State Bank of India Officers Service Rules, specifically referencing Rule 66(3)(iii) which limits the Disciplinary Authority's power to impose major penalties. The Court upheld the High Court's decision to set aside the removal order, emphasizing that the Appointing Authority must consider the findings of the Inquiring Authority and the Respondent's explanations before imposing penalties. The Court concluded that the removal was not justified based on the procedural lapses identified in the disciplinary process.

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. vs B.R.SAINI · Niyam