Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

december 2017

Supreme Court of India · 2017-12-07

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, KOLHAPUR vs M/S CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS PUNE

Citation / case number
SC 2011/35910
Court
Supreme Court of India
Petitioner
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, KOLHAPUR
Respondent
M/S CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS PUNE
Author
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
Bench
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

Judgment text excerpt

The Supreme Court examined the validity of the subsidy scheme under the Bombay Entertainments Duty Act, 1923, which provided for an exemption of entertainment duty for Multiplex Theatre Complexes for three years, followed by a 25% duty for the next two years. The Court upheld the amendments made to the Act, emphasizing the need for government support to promote cinema amidst declining occupancy rates due to competition from cable television and home viewing. The judgment confirmed that the scheme was a legitimate exercise of legislative power aimed at fostering cultural infrastructure in the state.

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, KOLHAPUR vs M/S CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS PUNE · Niyam